Statistics : Posted by LAuryn • on Tue Aug 31, 2010 2:40 am • Replies 0 • Views 0
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
![]() | Quote: The sun speaks On Dec 13, 2006, the sun itself provided a crucial clue, when a solar flare sent a stream of particles and radiation toward Earth. Purdue nuclear engineer Jere Jenkins, while measuring the decay rate of manganese-54, a short-lived isotope used in medical diagnostics, noticed that the rate dropped slightly during the flare, a decrease that started about a day and a half before the flare. | ![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
![]() | Quote: All of the evidence points toward | ![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
Statistics : Posted by jamesrm • on Mon Aug 23, 2010 6:24 pm • Replies 0 • Views 10
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
![]() | Quote: The sun speaks On Dec 13, 2006, the sun itself provided a crucial clue, when a solar flare sent a stream of particles and radiation toward Earth. Purdue nuclear engineer Jere Jenkins, while measuring the decay rate of manganese-54, a short-lived isotope used in medical diagnostics, noticed that the rate dropped slightly during the flare, a decrease that started about a day and a half before the flare. | ![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
![]() | Quote: All of the evidence points toward | ![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
Statistics : Posted by davelook • on Mon Dec 29, 2008 9:47 am • Replies 19 • Views 1471
Statistics : Posted by Mark • on Mon Apr 12, 2010 9:48 am • Replies 0 • Views 1
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
![]() | jamesrm wrote: This could be a hard one for Legacy Science to Ignore? | ![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
Statistics : Posted by wsitze • on Fri Apr 09, 2010 9:35 pm • Replies 1 • Views 51
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
![]() | jamesrm wrote: This could be a hard one for Legacy Science to Ignore? | ![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
Statistics : Posted by JS • on Fri Oct 09, 2009 11:59 am • Replies 15 • Views 942
Statistics : Posted by bperet • on Tue Sep 29, 2009 9:26 am • Replies 2 • Views 254
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
![]() | Quote: Larson is talking about "fictitious results of relating motions to an arbitrary reference system". He was referring to the currently accepted theories. | ![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
![]() | Quote: These independent units of motion, as we will call them, are superimposed on the moving reference background in much the same manner as | ![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
Statistics : Posted by RAB • on Sun Aug 02, 2009 9:20 am • Replies 10 • Views 504
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
![]() | Quote: Larson is talking about "fictitious results of relating motions to an arbitrary reference system". He was referring to the currently accepted theories. | ![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
![]() | Quote: These independent units of motion, as we will call them, are superimposed on the moving reference background in much the same manner as | ![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
![]() | Jan Sammer wrote: Since such photons would be travelling along a simple one-dimensional path, capable of being fully represented in a conventional reference system, they would not display any of the interference phenomena and wave-like features of regular photons. They would be polarized, since the one dimension of translational motion open to such photons would always be congruent | ![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
Statistics : Posted by Horace • on Thu Mar 12, 2009 7:48 pm • Replies 22 • Views 1000
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
![]() | Jan Sammer wrote: Since such photons would be travelling along a simple one-dimensional path, capable of being fully represented in a conventional reference system, they would not display any of the interference phenomena and wave-like features of regular photons. They would be polarized, since the one dimension of translational motion open to such photons would always be congruent | ![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
Statistics : Posted by bperet • on Sat Jun 20, 2009 11:40 am • Replies 0 • Views 239
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
![]() | davelook wrote: "Why would similarly-charged particles (protons) adhere in the nucleus instead of flying apart? A new fundamental force was invented to keep them together." It's a shame that quarks were unknown, since the ability of protons (plus neutrons) to form stable nuclei is now fully explained by the sub-charges of the quarks. seehttp://www.unclear2nuclear.com/np.php Of course, the strong force is still required to keep the 2 +2/3 up quarks inside the proton. | ![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
Statistics : Posted by StevenO • on Sun Aug 05, 2007 8:42 am • Replies 3 • Views 928
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
![]() | davelook wrote: "Why would similarly-charged particles (protons) adhere in the nucleus instead of flying apart? A new fundamental force was invented to keep them together." It's a shame that quarks were unknown, since the ability of protons (plus neutrons) to form stable nuclei is now fully explained by the sub-charges of the quarks. seehttp://www.unclear2nuclear.com/np.php Of course, the strong force is still required to keep the 2 +2/3 up quarks inside the proton. | ![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
Statistics : Posted by bperet • on Sat May 09, 2009 2:06 pm • Replies 0 • Views 408
Statistics : Posted by bperet • on Sun Mar 29, 2009 6:01 pm • Replies 5 • Views 290
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
![]() | Quote: One of the long-standing quandary of nuclear physics is why does p-n(proton-neutron or deuterium) form a stable nucleus but the p-p (proton-proton) does not form a stable nucleus. Even more puzzling is why the n-n (neutron-neutron) pair will not form a stable particle. Analyzed from the perspective of the current nuclear models and | ![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
Statistics : Posted by davelook • on Sun Mar 22, 2009 12:27 pm • Replies 1 • Views 199
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
![]() | Quote: One of the long-standing quandary of nuclear physics is why does p-n(proton-neutron or deuterium) form a stable nucleus but the p-p (proton-proton) does not form a stable nucleus. Even more puzzling is why the n-n (neutron-neutron) pair will not form a stable particle. Analyzed from the perspective of the current nuclear models and | ![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
Statistics : Posted by bperet • on Sun Mar 22, 2009 12:05 pm • Replies 0 • Views 1996
Statistics : Posted by bperet • on Sat Mar 21, 2009 6:34 pm • Replies 0 • Views 224
Statistics : Posted by wsitze • on Wed Feb 25, 2009 1:32 pm • Replies 27 • Views 830
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
![]() | ad wrote: Steven, I noted your debating attempt on the BAUT ATM forum. Personally I think such challenges are pointless. Never the less, good luck... PS> I made the comment about locating a reference for Nehru's formula from GR for the precession. PPS> Bruce, I don't seem to be able to find the equivalent of this: http://www.reciprocalsystem.com/rs/cwkv ... etperi.htm on the library pages? | ![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
Statistics : Posted by StevenO • on Tue Feb 24, 2009 1:13 am • Replies 3 • Views 250
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
![]() | ad wrote: Steven, I noted your debating attempt on the BAUT ATM forum. Personally I think such challenges are pointless. Never the less, good luck... PS> I made the comment about locating a reference for Nehru's formula from GR for the precession. PPS> Bruce, I don't seem to be able to find the equivalent of this: http://www.reciprocalsystem.com/rs/cwkv ... etperi.htm on the library pages? | ![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() | Attachment: Fundamentals-Flowchart.gifFundamentals-Flowchart.gifhttp://space.newscientist.com/article/d ... Statistics : Posted by frankm • on Fri Aug 31, 2007 3:44 pm • Replies 0 • Views 881 ]]> The article is available at arXiv. http://www.arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf ... 0908v2.pdf The newscientist has a review of the article. http://space.newscientist.com/article/d ...]]> This letter is a result of an invitation from ISUS via Ron Satz to attend the conference and give an after dinner talk on my memories of Dewey. I regret that I have had to decline both invitations. However, with the possibility there might be some interest in a letter, I will share with you a few memories of my 58 years with my husband and his interest in ISUS. This will not be a speech, it will be an informal chat with you about ... Statistics : Posted by bperet • on Fri Jul 20, 2007 12:17 pm • Replies 0 • Views 793 ]]> This letter is a result of an invitation from ISUS via Ron Satz to attend the conference and give an after dinner talk on my memories of Dewey. I regret that I have had to decline both invitations. However, with the possibility there might be some interest in a letter, I will share with you a few memories of my 58 years with my husband and his interest in ISUS. This will not be a speech, it will be an informal chat with you about ...]]>
This is a good question, Phil. I'll give it a shot. Youwrote:
In the universe of motion, a "Euclidean point" doesn't exist except as motion; that is, the point itself that is "backing ... Statistics : Posted by Douglas Bundy • on Sun Sep 03, 2006 5:08 am • Replies 11 • Views 2266 ]]>
This is a good question, Phil. I'll give it a shot. Youwrote:
In the universe of motion, a "Euclidean point" doesn't exist except as motion; that is, the point itself that is "backing ...]]>
They're theoretical postulates, not laws. Replace "must be Euclidean" with "can be considered in a Euclidean context" and you're got a more valid statement. Statistics : Posted by mwells • on Tue Nov 15, 2005 6:57 pm • Replies 168 • Views 17817 ]]>
They're theoretical postulates, not laws. Replace "must be Euclidean" with "can be considered in a Euclidean context" and you're got a more valid statement.]]>
I would suggest that we designate the RST as the system used to construct the theory, and the RSt as the theory constructed using the RST. That way, we can avoid confusion, I think.
... Statistics : Posted by Douglas Bundy • on Fri Nov 11, 2005 2:24 am • Replies 12 • Views 1337 ]]>
I would suggest that we designate the RST as the system used to construct the theory, and the RSt as the theory constructed using the RST. That way, we can avoid confusion, I think.
...]]>
The interesting thing about this whole issue of non-commutative products of vectors, is that it's a natural outcome of vectorial motion in a 3D spatial coordinate system. What this reflects, then, is that the RST is a system OF physical theory, which encompasses ... Statistics : Posted by Douglas Bundy • on Mon Nov 07, 2005 6:14 am • Replies 20 • Views 1909 ]]>
The interesting thing about this whole issue of non-commutative products of vectors, is that it's a natural outcome of vectorial motion in a 3D spatial coordinate system. What this reflects, then, is that the RST is a system OF physical theory, which encompasses ...]]>
It seems that the "shape of now" is not a sphere after all !!! The drawing below has been taken from an exellent paper by D.G.Pavlov, available at: http://hypercomplex.xpsweb.com/articles/151/en/pdf/01-03-e.pdf ... Statistics : Posted by Horace • on Wed Nov 03, 2004 5:50 pm • Replies 9 • Views 1275 ]]>
It seems that the "shape of now" is not a sphere after all !!! The drawing below has been taken from an exellent paper by D.G.Pavlov, available at: http://hypercomplex.xpsweb.com/articles/151/en/pdf/01-03-e.pdf ...]]> Regards David ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|